Archive for October, 2009

Senate Committee Plans to Extend and Expand Tax Credit

Saturday, October 31st, 2009

On October 30th, the Wall Street Journal reported that a Senate committee has reached a compromise on extending and expanding the $8000 tax credit for first-time buyers due to expire on November 30th.

While the compromise still must be passed by the full Senate, this agreement would extend the existing credit for first-time buyers, while offering a new credit of up to $6500 for some existing homeowners. This reduced credit would be available to all homebuyers who have been in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

Washington lawmakers also raised the qualifying income limits to $125,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for joint taxpayers from the current $75,000 and $150,000. Under the Senate compromise, buyers must have accepted contracts by April 30th and closed escrows by June 30th.

The new provisions are aimed at broadening availability of the credit beyond first-time buyers and giving the weakened real estate market a bigger boost while preventing real estate investors from benefitting. While Senate lawmakers appear to have reached a deal on the substance of the tax credit, they are still at odds over how it would be brought to the Senate floor. The measure still faces votes in the full Senate and House.

Federal Refinancing Plan Reaching Few Homeowners

Friday, October 30th, 2009

A program designed to assist homeowners who are “underwater” (that is, whose home debt is greater than the  market value of the home) by allowing them to refinance at current low rates despite having little or no equity in the home has reached fewer than 3%  of targeted homeowners so far.

As reported in today’s Washington Post, this program, for eligible people whose loans are held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, has only reached 130,000 out of the potential 5,000,000 borrowers. This initiative is separate from the loan modification program. A government spokesperson says they hope the program will begin to move faster in the future.

Non-profit Organization Targets Loan-Modification Scams

Friday, October 30th, 2009

The L.A. Times reports on October 27th that a national housing nonprofit organization is launching an educational campaign to combat loan modification scams. The nonprofit, NeighborWorks, is starting the campaign in Southern California which has been hit hard by the foreclosure crisis.

So-called loan modification consultants — often attorneys, mortgage bankers, or real estate agents — often ask for up-front fees ranging from $1500 to $3000 from troubled homeowners to help them reduce their mortgage payments. These consultants promise to negotiate with the lenders to work towards a loan modification. Meanwhile, these services are provided to free for federally approved nonprofits, such as NeighborWorks.

Besides paying up-front money, troubled homeowners also lose valuable time which could be better spent with free nonprofit agencies.

“California Atty. Genl. Jerry Brown’s office has reported receiving more than 2,500 complaints against loan modification consultants and businesses through Oct. 14th of this year, up from 163 in all of 2008,” the newspaper reports.

Eileen Fitzgerald, from NeighborWorks, says that these frauds often target Seniors, Latinos, African Americans, and Asian Americans.

For the first three weeks of November, community organizers and volunteers with NeighborWorks and its local affiliate, Los Angeles Neighborhood Housing Services, will be distributing marketing materials to warn people about loan modification fraud.

Credit Card Dispute Can Interfere with Mortgage Application

Friday, October 30th, 2009

The LA Times reported today that some applicants for refinancing mortgages are having difficulty getting their applications processed simply because they may have disputed a credit card charge (which is their right), this occurring even among applicants with excellent credit histories.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act guarantees consumers the right to dispute erroneous information in their credit files. However raising such a dispute (even when justified by the facts) causes the mortgage application underwriting to switch from “automated underwriting” to “manual underwriting,” by Fannie Mae’s rules. This requires more time and effort by the banks, and in the current market where there are many applications for refinancing, banks sometimes prefer to simply reject the application and blame it on Fannie Mae rather than going throught the more laborious underwriting.

Fannie Mae is considering modifying this policy, so there is reason to hope for a change.

Do Banks Prefer Foreclosures over Loan Modifications?

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

At the start of the foreclosure crisis, personal finance consultants told struggling homeowners to contact their lenders if they couldn’t pay their monthly loan payments. The lenders, they were told, wanted to do everything they could to avoid a foreclosure.

Now these consultants aren’t so sure that the banks want to avoid foreclosure. Homeowners start down a difficult road towards loan modification and are met with indifference and incompetence at the bank.

In March, the Treasury Department did begin a loan modification program to encourage loan servicers to modify troubled loans to prevent foreclosures. But the process has proved very slow and frustrating, and foreclosures continue.

According to a new report by the National Consumer Law Center, it’s no mystery why loan servicers are dragging their feet on loan modifications. The report suggests that these companies actually stand to make money if the troubled property goes to foreclosure.

In almost every case, the loan servicer doesn’t own the loan. It’s simply a company — usually a bank — hired to collect the money from the homeowner and deliver the funds to the investors who own the mortgage. The investors lose money if the property goes to foreclosure, but the servicer doesn’t. And homeowners seeking to save their homes by modifying unaffordable loans typically deal with these servicers.

“Loan modifications inevitably cost the servicer something,” the report says. “A servicer deciding between a foreclosure and a loan modification faces the prospect of near certain loss if the loan is modified, and no penaly, but potential profit, if the home is foreclosed.

This report certainly poses a dilemma to the homeowner appplying for a loan modification. If you are one of these homeowners, be sure you are working with a qualified professional who can guid you through the loan modification process.

Update on Extending the Tax Credit for First-Time Home Buyers

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Today, Oct. 23rd, The House Ways and Means Committee began meeting to discuss possible extension of the First Time Homebuyers’ $8000 tax credit. Unfortunately, the primary concern is the estimated $139M in fraud that has taken place during the time the tax credit has been available. It appears that non-first-time buyers and minors have taken advantage of the program. 

It is a shame that fraud exists in a program that has successfully helped so many eligible borrowers while at the same time, stimulating the housing market.  Let’s hope that the Committee can make adjustments to eliminate the fraud and keep the program alive!

Join Hikers and Equestrians to Celebrate the Trails of San Marcos

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

On Nov. 7th, the city of San Marcos will present the 18th annual San Marcos Trails Day. This free hiking and equestrian event will begin at 9:00 a.m.

Each year, San Marcos Trails Days promotes the extensive trail system in the city and also encourages membership in t he Friends of Sasn Marcos Parks and Trails. Participants can choose from 3, 5.5, or 7-mile hikes, and certain trails usually not available to the public, such as South Lake trails, will be available. Equestrians can ride through 5.5 miles of scenic trails.

If you’d like to attend, please meet at the south end of Santa Barbara Street in San Marcos. For more information, visit www.san-marcos.net.

New Act Protects Buyers Who Buy Foreclosed Properties

Monday, October 19th, 2009

On Oct. 15th, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 957 into law. This bill protects consumers by ensuring that they have the right to choose t heir own real estate service providers when purchasing foreclosed properties.

This bill prohibits sellers of so-called REO properties — typically properties owned by banks — from requiuring the buyer to use a particular title company, escrow company, or other real estate service provider. This unethical, anti-competitive practice drives up costs for homebuyers and takes business away from locally owned companies.

The bill requires that REO sellers provide a disclosure notice to buyers informing them of their rights to choose their own title, escrow, and other real estate services. Sellers who violate the privisions of this bill are busject to enforcement action by state regulators and liable to buyers for civil penalties.

When Should You Look at Other Options Beyond a Loan Modification?

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

If you are one of the many thousands of homeowners who have received a Notice of  Default on your home, you now have 180 days before the bank has the right to set a date for a Trustee Sale on your home.

If you are like many other homeowners,you have started to work with the bank, either by yourself or through a 3rd party, to try to get the bank to agree to a modification of your current loan. But it’s taking forever, and it’s very difficult to get any response from the bank.

Suddenly, you receive a Notice of a Trustee Sale on your home, and you still don’t know if your Loan Modification is going through. What should you do?

The first thing you should do is to call your contact at the bank and ask for an extension of your Trustee Sale date. Then, you can try to push them to give you an answer on your modification. As long as your sale date is far enough out, then you’ll have time to work on your loan modification.

If they won’t extend your sale date, you may decide that it’s time to consider a short sale. In a short sale, you will still lose your house at the end, but your credit will be damaged for only two years instead of the 7-10 years of damage caused by a Foreclosure.

We can help you with this decision. Please post an answer on this blog and we are happy to discuss your situation.

Home Prices in SD Stabilize

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

The San Diego Union Tribune reported today that home prices, as reported by MDA DataQuick, stabilized in the past quarter, with 8 out of 56 ZIP codes showing increase in prices over last year. The median resale price of a home was down only 5% compared with the comparable quarter last year, a marked improvement over the 24% drop in median price starting in 2007.

The highest areas of appreciation of prices were West Escondido and South Oceanside. Several central areas of San Diego continued to show falling prices.

The inventory of available detached homes on the market is down, at 5670, compared with 8562 in mid-July. This is partly due to fewer distressed properties on the market.  Often the distressed properties are offered at very good prices, resulting in multiple, competitive offers. Sometimes first-time buyers are frustrated in their efforts to purchase properties by all cash offers from investors. It may be that a new wave of foreclosures will increase the number of available properties.

In general the market seems to have hit bottom, so this may be a good time to consider buying before prices begin to rise.